Example of original image and after augmentation
Models |
Loss |
Accuracy |
Original | 0.1200 | 0.9878 |
Augmented | 0.0704 | 0.999 |
Illustration of the 10 reference classes
Original Augmented
Note: Each curve is drawn from a dominance result of an evaluation with a model and one of the 10 images presented above.
The model on the left is less accurate. The curves are less close to the periphery and more close to the centre. Whereas the model on the right illustrates dominances that are well demarcated for each of the figures. We can therefore understand from the analysis carried out with Saimple that the augmented model is much more efficient.
Original Augmented
Note: Each curve is derived from a dominance result of an evaluation with a model and one of the 10 images presented earlier.
Graph of max deltas by class and model :
Reminder: The higher the delta max value, the more robust the model is
It can be seen from the evaluation that the values of the max deltas of the "Augmented" model are always higher than those of the "Original" model. Thus the model has been made more robust by the data augmentation. By averaging the ratios of the max deltas over 10 evaluations between the two models, we notice that the max delta of the "Augmented" model is twice as large as that of the "Original" model.Contact us : support@hannibaltvshow.com